The only time anybody ever tried to punch me because of something I created for a newspaper or TV station was over a cartoon.
It was a long, long time ago when I was just starting out as a high school journalist and cartoonist. A quarterback thought my cartoon had dissed his girlfriend. (Okay, it had; but it only kinda looked like her.) He came looking for me.
The most uncomfortable experience I ever had here at KU was over a cartoon. In the late 1970s, a University Daily Kansan cartoonist decided to take exception with what he thought was the local Jewish reaction to a reception featuring Hitler's punchbowl at a museum event. I was Kansan adviser then and it was the only time I know of that the Faculty Senate ever censured the student paper.
Something about cartoons makes the people they offend very angry and very volatile. The aftermath of the Danish political cartoons supports that theory with terrifying clarity.
I am more than willing to take heat for the First Amendment. I am more than willing to defend student journalists who might decide to publish the offending cartoons. I would take a punch for free speech but, when it is my decision to make, I won't ask others to take the punch for me  or even with me.
The reason you won't see the face of The Prophet on the web sites for which I am responsible is overwhelmingly influenced by my concern for my students, my colleagues and my newsroom. People who believe it is right to riot and okay for others to die because religious beliefs have been breeched by a newspaper do not carry much weight in my personal Potter Box.
They do, however, intimidate me.
This is not a good thing for the media, for the faithful, or for the world. But, I have too many years in the trenches to send my troops over the top to face this kind of reaction and danger. May Allah help us all.