My best friend/current roommate has been a bit out of luck lately. Getting laid off from his job because management was coming up short on work for the end of summer has caused him to go into a mild depressive state which consists of surrounding himself with people he likes, drinking alcohol, and playing a lot of Xbox. All good things in measure and I can't say that I blame him at all. Losing his job was a blow to his self esteem and, now, my wallet. I make plenty of money in my 30-plus-hours-a-week-part-time-job to support us for the time being, but that in itself is making life pretty hard on me. Thirty hours a week in a kitchen is, for lack of a better word, not fun at all.
My buddy's recent unemployment will be fixed shortly, though, because he's a very determined person and already has leads for jobs and interviews. I'm not worried about him, but it makes me consider people who aren't as lucky as him, and suffer extended unemployment with little hope of even rejoining the work force.
This last January I visited San Francisco and witnessed the cities immense population of homeless people, unable to take care of themselves save for begging on the street corners, bus stops with the permeating smell of garbage and piss, or in the subway just to get out of the pouring rain. It really was a tragic eye opener for me. My only experience with homelessness (I'm from a really small town) had been the few I'd seen around downtown Lawrence. I was shocked to see just how many people couldn't afford to take care of themselves with even the barest of necessities.
I was rather disconcerted at how most people going to work, getting their morning Starbucks fix treated the many homeless people around the city. It's not that they treated them bad or anything like that… they mostly just ignored them, passing by the outstretched hand or the opened guitar case. We seem to, as a society, have become dull to the fact that there are people less fortunate than ourselves living right alongside us. They're not in a country halfway across the world in a remote, third-world village; they're here.
I suppose that experience is one of the factors that has led to my ill feelings to some of the more outspoken animal activist groups. I realize that animals aren't always being treated in the most civilized way (just Google Michael Vick) but I think we should try to take a little more action on the well being of human beings. Do I think humans are more important that animals? You bet your ass I do, and I think fretting about animals wearing lipstick seems a little ridiculous in comparison. That isn't to say that I believe animals should be treated this way, just that I think people should be taken care of first and foremost.
You might be wondering what my all encompassing solution to homelessness might be, but I'll tell you the truth. I don't have one. It is a big problem that one simple patch on the dam won't fix. But I think that if we want to talk about equality and civil rights, we should take a closer look at what's happening in our own backyard.
Comments (2)
Hey Nick,
I've wanted to respond to one of your posts for a while. I don't know if you remember me but I was in your Brit LIt class last fall with Jeremy Winfrey. Kudos on San Fran. It sounds like you kicked ass out there. Bravo Zulu.
I liked what you said in this piece about homeless people versus animal rights. My favorite part is: Do I think humans are more important that animals? You bet your ass I do... I love it when people lay their truth out there like that. Unapologetic and common sensical.
It was kind of a surprise when you first started talking about animal rights because it hadn't been mentioned before in the post. A transition would have made it make more sense, but even if you just mentioned animal rights in the title then I would have gotten it right away. Besides that, this piece was right on.
Posted by Matthew Foster | September 3, 2007 9:09 PM
Posted on September 3, 2007 21:09
I understand how it can be frustrating to look at a problem that causes real human suffering, and then see people who are putting so much energy towards the rights of, of all things, animals. But there are a couple of things I'll posit, just to be that guy.
1. Consider what most people do with their energy. As you noticed with the Starbucks fuckers, most people do nothing to aleviate the suffering of anyone or anything. They spend $6 a day on coffee, they put in their 40-60 hours a week at a corporate turnstyle; they play their X-Box, they collect their baseball cards. Between the 90% of people who spend most of their time trying only to make themselves more comfortable, and the handful of loose screws who think maybe we don't need to spray battery acid into the eyes of rabits just to see if a new eyeliner is safe, I'll take the latter.
2. You do what you can/you've only got so much to give. Every single time I've gotten even peripherally involved in any sort of social movement, the exact same thing happens: I've got half a dozen bleeding hearts on one side, and half a dozen ditto heads on the other, all saying the same thing: "Why contribute to THIS movement? Why not THIS one? Or THIS one? Or THIS one?" etc., etc. It doesn't matter what you give your time to, there will always be something more noble, more efficacious you "should" be doing.
3. You're making a fairly baseless assumption that because these people are involved with a movement against animal cruelty, they care about animals more than they care about humans. For all you know, each and every member of that organization also belongs to Amnesty International, contributes to OXFAM, raises money for POW/MIA groups, or whatever--it's just that protesting animal cruelty is what they happen to do on Tuesday (or whatever day--you get my drift).
Just a few things to consider.
Posted by Ryan McG | September 3, 2007 11:22 PM
Posted on September 3, 2007 23:22