As a journalism student learning about social media
throughout numerous classes it has proven itself useful and important. As a reporter for KUJH-TV I have used
Facebook frequently to find sources for stories. I have been able to generate story ideas from
people's Facebook status. Social
networking sites have proven beneficial and helpful for me personally. Do I think it should completely take over as
a form of journalism? Not necessarily.
Coming from a small, rural town in
When it comes to using Twitter and Facebook to promote myself as a journalist, I like the idea but I also question how much it really gives a journalist credibility without seeming egotistical. I like how these social networks can humanize a journalist for their followers but it doesn't seem as valuable as face-to-face communication. For me personally I find it much more difficult to trust people online compared to communication through face-to-face interactions and I think there are a lot of people out there that would agree. However, a bonus of these social networking sites is how they allow people across the globe to follow journalists and their works when face-to-face communication is unachievable. The question that Brian Solis asks in his article, "Can the Statusphere Save Journalism?" I think it is a reasonable question but personally I think the Statusphere alone will not save journalism. I don't believe journalism needs that much saving because journalists have always adapted and evolved with the ages and I believe all journalists will continue that trend.


Leave a comment