Pseudo-journalism and the primitive mindset

| | Comments (1)

If somebody told me that I'd be gathering infoberries instead of hunting meaty stories, I would have stopped sharpening my arrowhead (pencil) years ago.

Such is the new journalism trend: newspapers are merely supplemental information providers. People go to the source's blog for information. (With this in mind, I'm trying not to say goodbye to my journalism education!)

Wait a minute, isn't the information highway full of some shitty drivers? Who's to say if these info-speeders are any good behind the wheel? If somebody creates e-roadkill, doesn't blood get all over the web?

The Internet has its share of dark, creepy alleys. Why not point travelers in the right direction?
Photo illustration: Brian Lewis-Jones

Here's what newspapers should consider their new duty: become a picky, fact-checking aggregate of knowledge. Not just a creator of original content, but also a seeker of the good stuff – keep the crap at bay and point to things deemed worthwhile.

The concept is an extension of what (most) journalists are (maybe) good at: using their judgment. Even though we would be mere gatherers of info on the ‘net, together we could be a collective crap-killing machine.

Here are three steps to journalists keeping their place in the world, salvaging a paycheck and feeling like their lives aren't ruined by this www-dot-doohickey:

1) Find the news of the day
2) Use a source's blog for their side of the story
3) Report any gaps that remain

Think of it like to Digg or BoingBoing combined with newspaper reporting. If somebody already made their case on their blog, don't summarize, just link! Just like hard data can serve as the best storytelling method, a source's blog can summarize a sentiment better than re-reporting ever could.

BoingBoing is close: the readership sends in an idea, the editorial staff deems it BoingBoingworthy and posts the story with some links. Now, add some research and you too can be an info aggregate!

With this, journalists would open the gates for people to find good info and close the gate for nonsense. 'Course, a bit of reporting would still be required; otherwise, the industry would passively take whatever people give it.

1 Comments

Love the infographic. And your thinking is getting close to something that isn't quite cooked yet: What the canon of skills is for the online journalist. The part you have right is both aggregation and a new form of gatekeeping.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Brian Lewis-Jones published on February 19, 2008 4:39 PM.

Blogging Beyond the Teleprompter was the previous entry in this blog.

Blogporters is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.