The Blooper Facts

| | Comments (3)

When the term "blooper factory" was first uttered, my mind began to race with the possibilities. I've always liked the word "blooper." To me, it's one of the rare words that sounds as funny as what it describes, like "platypus" or "fart." And a blooper factory would be a pretty sweet place to work. I can only think of two factories that would be better: a candy factory, particularly the part of the assembly line between the finished candy and the wrapping machines, and a monkey factory, which I feel is self-explanatory. (OK, short explanation: the factory not only makes monkeys, but is also staffed by monkeys!) Mass-producing and packaging bloopers sounds like it would be nearly as enjoyable as working in a monkey factory, and there'd probably be fewer feces tossed at you. Probably.


The Canadians get it...why can't we?
Video: clarksoup8
In a divine turn of luck, a television newscast is one of the best blooper factories that exists in our modern world. Not only are there men wearing coats and ties with no pants and women with too much makeup attempting to recite hastily-scripted lines with little-to-no preparation, but there's video cameras everywhere to capture the hilarity. In fact, statistics show that the average newscast produces enough bloopers each day to provide several minutes worth of laughter for children in third-world countries. And if anybody could use a good laugh, it's children in third-world countries.

To not take advantage of this natural resource would be akin to a Native American not using every part of the buffalo, or Malaysia not maxing the output of their monkey factories. We already produce the bloopers, so we might as well use them. Throwing them away just deprives the world of the staggering amount of stutters, Freudian slips, burp-faces, eyebrow wiggles, and poorly-timed laughs that our broadcast unintentionally produces every day.

And we can produce more! A few minor tactical changes could exponentially increase our blooper yield. First, we should never, ever turn our cameras or mikes off. Second, an anchor should attempt to distract or taunt their co-anchor whenever they are off-camera, preferably by dancing provocatively, making silly faces, or sneaking a small animal into the studio and releasing it during an especially serious story. Third, we should force our producers to write the scripts for the entire newscast in two minutes or less, instead devoting their precious time to the formulation of humorous tosses, puns and one-liners.

Eventually, using these tactics and more, we could create enough bloopers to do away with our traditional newscast altogether. KUJH can become The Daily Show of Douglas County, except with less actual news content. And maybe, just maybe, we can bring a smile to the face of some starving child in a third-world country that inexplicably has high-speed internet access. Because after all, if we're not producing a product designed solely for the entertainment of children and/or immature college guys sitting at home drinking crappy beer and watching YouTube, then what in the hell are we doing?

Oh, and our ratings would probably go up.

So let's get to work and make this Blooper Factory Fantasy a Blooper Reality. For the children.

3 Comments

Like a bow hunter's arrow passing through a wild turkey, the point of sarcasm is sometimes lost on the intended audience. So I am guessing you are anti-blooper really?

If additional humor is a must, how about a "strange news" segment? We could have users submit ideas, it'll make the kids laugh tears of
joy. . .

I think my main point is that bloopers can be a high risk/high reward idea. Honestly, I do feel like creating a constant stream of bloopers can degrade the credibility of our product, but it would also increase our ratings. So there's probably a balance to be struck somewhere in there. How to achieve that balance would take another blog post or three.

Perhaps on an abstract level, this post reflects what bloopers and comedy in general can do to news content. It can leave the audience not really sure if what they just heard was true or not, and if it's entertaining enough, they won't really care. I'm not sure if that's a positive development for what I think should remain a news-first outlet.

Leave a comment

Students

  • Matt Bechtold
  • Timothy Burgess
  • Lauren Cunningham
  • Brenna Daldorph
  • Shaymarie Genosky
  • Rachael Gray
  • Kendra Hall
  • Kelsey Hayes
  • Haley Jones
  • Nina Libby
  • Josh Patterson
  • Joseph Preiner
  • Sean Rosner
  • Jessica Sain-Baird
  • Deepa Sampat
  • Jesse Temple
  • Haley Jones
  • Carnez Williams
  •  

Faculty / Staff

Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Christopher Raine published on November 25, 2007 10:58 PM.

A world without showtunes is a dark world indeed was the previous entry in this blog.

Come tour the Blooper Factory is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.